SAJJAD ALI versus STATE
Section 302 (b) fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), section 10 (3) evidence was appreciated, the mother of the deceased girl, and her brother, whose place of residence was natural and did not exist. Inquiries were made, immediately without final exaggeration, with definitive and credible statements that conveyed confidence, post-mortem reports, chemical examiner reports and circumstantial evidence. In the FIR, the name of the accused was the sole perpetrator of the crime and does not indicate any affiliation. Did not show any hostility, the possibility of incorrect identification of the accused was rejected completely. The trial against the accused was not one of the massacres by any stranger. The deceased's half-brother and not only murdered him, but he also accompanied the ten-year-old victim to forcibly alter any mitigating circumstances by the trial court to the slightest death sentence. Was not available for the accused and was sentenced.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Turbat lawyer