Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR ALI ALIAS JAFFAR versus STATE

Testimonies 324, 394 and 460 of the evidence were filed with the FIR immediately with the details of the accused, and the specific character of each of them, the eye witnesses, correctly identified the accused in the identification test and the case. The evidence of the testimony was also confirmed at the hearing, according to the recovery of the accused's possession and the medical evidence which resulted in severe injuries to both witnesses and the deceased. It could not be ascertained that his death during the event eventually led to his death, but it is certain. That the casualties suffered by the accused and the witnesses are serious in nature. Even though it seems excessive, for the court to run consistently, two people were killed and injured not only in the face of the fact, they also fired at their heads and their eyes were slashed and glasses in the stomach. The witness who survived fortunately, his conviction was not only fair and appropriate, but also fully compatible with the gravity of the crime, as well as the trial court legally authorized to impose any sentence. To make it run continuously, but since all the crime parts of it are surrounded by each other because they are punished under it. The feared. And the convictions filed under Sections 242424, 4 39 PP and 6060 recorded against the accused were maintained under the circumstances, but their convictions under Sections 242424 and 606060, PPC, as well as interc. He was instructed to run and appealed with the PPC as well as his conviction famous lower court advocate from Shamsabad lawyer