Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNUS SOOMRO versus STATE

Sections 1 561A and 3403 of the Immigration Ordinance (XVIII 1979), Sections 10, 18 and 22 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 26 of the current case to terminate the FIR Was filed against the applicant for / under section 18 and 22 of the Migration Ordinance 1979 on the K at the Airport Deputy Director FIA Immigration Ordinance under the FIA Immigration Airport \ I by an oral order. Was filed under sections 10 and 22 of 1979. On the same prosecutor's story, the accused appeared in the Special Court Central \ I of Court where the judge summoned the investigating officer and found the accused innocent on the prosecutor's statement and the accused was not involved in the case. I was declared innocent. The facts and circumstances of the case against the accused before the special court before the Special Court will be double jeopardy and fall under Article 13 of the constituency. However, Section 26 and Section 403, CC of the General Clause Act, 1897, were charged that although he was an enterprise agent at \ K at, no document to prove any relation of the enterprise or the accused with it. The evidence was not brought to the record. Deposited a person as an enterprise agent to a group of individuals in relation to any individual or crime case immigration advocates phone number from Chunian lawyer