Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUBEEN versus MESSRS LONG LIFE BUILDERS

Under section 52 of the property, transfer of pending, pending case, the law of Les Pendens, section 52 of the Transferred Property Act, 1882, no party to this suit can exclude the disputed property. May affect the party who received the decree. In his favor, not only was he entitled to enforce this decree against the person against whom the decree was passed, but also against the person who had taken the title of the disputed property during the trial. , When changing the title or transferring ownership during the trial from the decision-maker. Only a symbolic title and occupation was to be treated with a third party and there was no reason that the decree holder should not be allowed to take action against the third party as the suit property was in actual possession while in the suit. The party will sell the disputed property to the third party. During the trial and eventually it failed to establish its title, the buyer of such property could not even get the protection it deserved to deprive the buyer of the third party's right to order. I title was transferred by a decision-maker during a trial, it was considered to be the sole representative of the decision-maker, and the act of selling the property, could not be allowed to defeat the claim of the justices That during the pendency of the suit, the property changed hands so that the rule of Les Penden was the third free Q was also applicable and in that case, he would not be entitled to defend the case independently of the obligor of this decision. jobs for fresh advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer