MESSRS TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI
A VII, R 2 Under the terms and conditions of the agreement, the jury bag was required to be delivered to the warehouse, which was outside the city government's municipal limits, for collection of the plaintiff and stated that the bags could not be used or sold. That are inside it. Plaintiff's boundaries of the City Government allow transit pass facilities, issuing a pass against the security deposit of a specified amount of money from the city government's municipality, outside the city government's municipal limits. , Demanded an exemption from the payment of octroi, which was submitted by the claimant. Since the security considered that the security amount would be returned to the plaintiff, upon completion of the delivery of the goods, the City Government refused to return the money and said that the security amount, the plaintiff had filed a lawsuit to recover the said amount and The plaintiff created correspondence between the parties. A sufficient number of witnesses were examined to prove that the goods were delivered to the warehouse, out of which the City Government had fallen outside the municipal limits of the City Government, with no material / documentary evidence to prove it. That the plaintiff has misused the transit pass facilities in any way, the citizen could only issue transit pass services when the government moved the goods outside its municipal limits. The government did not report on the record to show that the place where the warehouse was located falls within the municipal limits of the city government.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Digri lawyer