KHALIL-UR-REHMAN versus MST. VAKEELAN
Section 12 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Art 17 (2) (a), 47, 79, 80 and 118 suits for all three specific performance of the contract to sell to the executive. Acceptance and performance by other partner vendors Tendering clear evidence in a copy of the co-vendor's submission in a previous case for specific performance by the parties regarding the execution and agreement of the three vendors. During the plaintiff's claim that one witness has died, but does not say anything about the other witness, whether he was alive or capable of testifying, the non-production of the second witness's death certificate was entered into by the respondent. On refusing to comply, the burden of proving it falls on the plaintiff, H day was to examine the duty to confirm the witnesses until they died or were unable to present evidence. Unless it can be proved that such condition of the co-vendors can be used when the witness is either dead or unable to be confirmed. Failure to relieve the burden, which could not be transferred to the accused, the plaintiff's failure to prove the contract excluded the plaintiff \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Havelian lawyer