SHEHZAD RIAZ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY CABINET DIVISION
Articles 25 and 199 Appropriate protection for the purposes of Article 25 of the Equal Protection Constitution of the law was implicated in which the import of agricultural tractors was proposed as per the policy decision of the Economic Coordination Committee. The time of import of the tractors was solely those companies that had or were in the process of installing tractor manufacturing units in Pakistan. The applicant's complaint was that the companies given in the policy decision were classified as discriminatory. ? Violation of the Constitutional Guarantees and therefore entitled to abolish the decision or alternatively be entitled to consider the approval of the import of tractors on zero tariff, if such permission is granted Given to On the one hand, the applicant on the one hand was claiming that the PO light decision was discriminatory and that his rating was not justified and on the other hand he wanted to be included in the same rating under Article 25 of the Constitution. They were equal before the law and were entitled to equal protection of the law, however, the article did not. State prohibits treatment of citizens on the basis of reasonable classification. The nature of the rating, the basis of the Duterte Nation to avoid violating Article 25 of the Constitution, to justify a classification, must show that it was based on reasonable discrimination or that it was a citizen before the law. Article 25 of the Constitution pertaining to equality and the rational classification of equality through constitutions are allowed on a rational basis and stable in Article 25 of the Constitution. There were many different classifications of constitutional law that
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Bajaur lawyer