Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD AHMED versus HIGH COURT OF SINDH

Section 3B Subordinate Judicial Service Adore commented on the dismissal of the Appeal Reporting Officer / District and Sessions Judge, recording the appellant's ACR for the relevant year, the attitude of the appellant, which was filed by the P-section. As well as served as an Assistant Public Attorney. The lawyers and the litigants were invincible; they did not settle a single case on merit. He was accused of using a motor vehicle illegally, the matter being property and that on several occasions he refused to place orders on the bail documents and deliberately tried at court hours. Left without passing an order in which the appellant was not enjoying good reputation and the appellant's court was allegedly playing in the hands of Moharram Pen who revealed that he had been provided counsel. That, during the inspection, they were informed by the reporting officer of their weaknesses and suggested improvement. Arrived, but to no avail, as he did not respond to counsel, the appellant was granted a personal hearing, but he was unable to remove any of the remarks recorded in his ACR for the relevant year. The comprehension did not go beyond explanation. Despite the negative comments provided by the reporting officer and the opportunity to present their explanation and justify their position, they were unable to offer anything in the reaction but in the circumstances the appellant's representation was right. Rejected, delay in committing negative comments in the AC to appeal against any negative comments list of advocates from Bhera lawyer