Find a Lawyer

CAPTAIN S. M. ASLAM versus STATE

Sections 3 and 5 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Section 12 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Sections 200 and 439 of the private complaint were dismissed, without having examined the complainant on oath, Section 200, CRPC I was not obliged to record the court. Complainant's evidence Despite the fact that the allegations contained in the complaint were not proven to be a crime, or that the alleged offense was not a crime at the time of the occurrence of Section 5 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, it was also arbitrary. Was declared. An act or error to convince yourself of the merits and retention of a complaint to a court that was not even punished when it was committed is not punishable by a prior application of the law. The Unlawful Disadvantage Act, 2005, could be made. Frustration because it did not provide for its possible application was not only against the law-abiding principles but also against the provisions of the Articles. Twelve times the Constitution, which specifically protected against prejudicial penalties, resulted in consideration under Section 3 (1) of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005, if it had preceded the enactment. It could not be punished. Likewise, the claim that an unlawful injunction is a continuing offense can also be assessed under this Act, as under Section 3 (1), to discourage the process of entry to one's property. , Is intended to be captured. , Control or seize upon it from its owner or occupier, it is deemed to be punishable under section 3 (2), and the process of maintaining unlawful possession of any property is not a complaint on oath Check the manufacturer advocate for immigration from Dir lawyer