Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR KHAN versus SYED ABDUL HALEEM AGHA

Sections 13 and 15 reject the tenant Bona's new reason for relying on the landlord's personal need for his son Impact The landlord evacuates his son on the basis of personal need for the shop The controller dismissed the application upon request. Because two and a half years before filing the eviction petition, the disputed shop was let back by the landlord and his son did not appear in the witness box as a witness, even if the landlord had to Takes possession and still does not allow it. The landlord's personal requirement was always to choose the landlord and also to determine which of these properties was fit for his personal need and profession, since the shop was rented two and a half years before filing a removal request. Was taken, so the landlord was entitled to file the evacuation request for fresh cause of action, but the personally important need was proved by other independent evidence, from the actions taken in the petition. In harmony, the son's non-production was not illegal in the witnesses' landlord's decision in this case. Was approved by the controlling person and was ordered to evict the tenant is allowed to appeal against the patent advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer