HAJI NAUROZE KHAN versus MALIK RAZ MUHAMMAD
OI, R 10 & O XX, R 10 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 163 Defined for final decision after hearing the parties' arguments, transferring pendant lot with prayer under Article 163 of the testimony of law The request to impose as a party, 1984, in this regard, was not supported by the document, nor was it disclosed when or by what process, for swearing by the parties. Or was contemplated by which legal status indicates the plaintiff's interest in such a transfer. Under section 163 of the law property, the application to the legal property was not related to the claim of the claimant as it was made in this case, but rather to another fact or event which was related and such application was made in both cases. Was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kahuta lawyer
