Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HAJI NAUROZE KHAN versus MALIK RAZ MUHAMMAD


OI, R 10 & O XX, R 10 Qunun e Shahadat (10 of 1984), Article 163 Defined for final decision after hearing the parties' arguments, transferring pendant lot with prayer under Article 163 of the testimony of law The request to impose as a party, 1984, in this regard, was not supported by the document, nor was it disclosed when or by what process, for swearing by the parties. Or was contemplated by which legal status indicates the plaintiff's interest in such a transfer. Under section 163 of the law property, the application to the legal property was not related to the claim of the claimant as it was made in this case, but rather to another fact or event which was related and such application was made in both cases. Was rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.