Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE

Section 7 (a) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 164 praised the evidence, sitting in the car after the incident, when people identified him with a face and a brief. That he was arrested thereafter and a pistol was also recovered from his possession, the judicial confession made by the accused was voluntary, factual and reliable, which was contentious in material details through credible evidence, to record the confessional statement. The delay was just irregularity that could be ignored. Without any greed, rigor and coercion the court had satisfied the conscience, there was no reason why there was no reason to confirm the accused's confession to the extent of his own involvement in the crime, even to the guilty. There is no mitigating circumstance for even less punishment. And the culprits of the accused were retained best advocate from Timergara lawyer