BAZ MUHAMMAD versus STATE
Section 2 30b (b) Definition of Evidence Ation Two witnesses were excluded by the prosecutor for no reason, without any doubt, any evidence presented in support of his version Was offered to do. The first witnesses who arrived at the scene gained prominence and had to show a negative argument against the prosecution in order to withhold their evidence when claiming to identify the suspect as her husband's killer. The other prosecution's witnesses did. After the preliminary investigation, the complainant, along with the FIR register, showed that the accused was later involved in the case as the complainant's failure to explain the other two offenders further revealed that he had The accused was not identified who committed the murder of her husband, the accused was still on his duty with the two constables till the arrival of Section HO and other police officers, which means that He was not involved in the commission of the crime; no clear reliance was placed on the complainant's sole evidence for the various factors mentioned above. Can The defendant was acquitted on a charge of capital offense on a base charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Vehari lawyer