Find a Lawyer

LAL KHAN versus STATE

Appreciating the provisions of Sections 302 and 34, the doctor said that the doctor conducted a medical examination with the deceased, saying that the victim had suffered three gunshot wounds to his person, which proved that the victim had received violent death, however, medical evidence. , However, could not identify the suspect. In which litigation the record material was brought to prove that the accused was the person who participated in the crime. The presence of two prosecution witnesses who claimed that they claimed to be eyewitnesses, even though they were shown in the FIR, did not mention the names of the witnesses in the FIR. It was not enough to prove his testimony, as the five-hour unspecified delay was delayed, but the police station was still eight kilometers away from the scene, and prosecutor's testimony reported on the bicycle. It seems that such time wasted in the FIR's nomination of the accused and the presentation of the witnesses' names will not result in any way. The trial court relied on the testimony of the two prosecution witnesses to observe them. That the trial court's reference to the testimony of the witnesses was not correct because of the enmity or dissent against the accused. Types presence is not enough to put the seal on the evidence of a witness. But the acidic experience of a witness's truth with truth, but the natural merits of his statement. The alleged spectacle contradicted the witnesses' statements and the statements of the investigating officer on the location and whereabouts of the victim's body. list of supreme court advocates from Issa Khel lawyer