Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HASSAN versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION, QUETTA

Regulation 11 Balochistan Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act (X of 1977), 5 21 Balochistan Civil Servants (Efficiency and Dispensary) Rules, 1983, R16 Balochistan Civil Servant (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1992, R4 General Clause Act X of 1897), 5 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Employees Employees Must Retire Balochistan Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1983 Constitutional Petition to Retain Balochistan Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline Rules, 1992 Neither the Balochistan Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Employees Service Regulations, 1991 were adopted nor They were neither included nor approved by the government as 5% of the Balochistan Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act, 1977 is not under section 8 of the General Clause Act, 1897. The same applies to the 1992 rules, which were neither enforced by the Provincial or National Assembly, nor can they be termed as Rigo, under the 1992 Rules, which constitute a constitution against the employees The statement made by the President or the Governor to the authorities under his authority shall not constitute legal status which cannot be made legal by mere adoption of the relationship between an employee and an employer, or the enforcement of legal laws, the term amendment shall be invalidated or re-enforced. Laws of 1992 will not be automatically enforced in place of the rules of 1983 The Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Employees Service Regulations, 1991 is the relationship between the boarder and the applicant. The Master and Servant High Court upheld the constitutional petition for lack of permanent rules. law firms from Laliah lawyer