Find a Lawyer

MST. NASIM AKHTAR versus KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Section 1 Deadly Accidental Compensation Compensation Plaintiff / Plaintiff's Widow filed a lawsuit to recover compensation for herself and by other legal beneficiaries of the defendant who died in a road accident at the age of 28. In addition to his affidavit in the evidence, the defendant's hurry and negligence, the affidavit was also filed in evidence of the eyewitness testimony of the accident and inspected by the investigating officer, who prepared the original copy of the journal, Post-mortem. The original copy, copy medical report and other relevant documents of the petitioner have provided oral and documentary evidence on record. I was fully proved that the death of her husband in the accident, the bus driver's indifference to the defendant in this case, occurred due to reckless driving and negligence of the plaintiff and defendant's witness testing. Drafted by him at length, but he failed to produce a cough in the case of the plaintiff where the fact of the AC was confessed to the accident, the evidence of the absence of negligence by the defendants was imposed on him. The defendant had neither inspected the bus driver or the conductor nor had any passenger been able to discern the fact that the victim's death was caused by the defendant's rapid sunlight and driving. The driver, who was clearly entitled to compensation for being the legal heir of the plaintiff and the other victims' beneficiaries, was entitled to compensation, the amount of compensation to the deceased plaintiff and other legal beneficiaries, The life expectancy of the deceased at the time of the anticipated death was determined by future life immigration advocates phone number from Noorpur nooranga lawyer