Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RUB SIDDIQUI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, THROUGH SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Article 199 Constitutional Petition Scope The auction plot petitioner claimed that he was the highest bidder in the auction of the under-lying plot and according to the auction terms, he deposited twenty-five per cent of the bid and also submitted the second installment. However, it was not yet approved by the highest authorized authority in connection with the plot in respect of the plot. The stand was that the bid submitted by the applicant was never approved by the competent authority and the applicant. Documents about information about his bid approval are managed by fake sources Or was. The claims filed in the petition from the Development Authority staff and the response from the authorities, along with some documents, made it clear that the applicant's claim in connection with the plot being discussed. Will be absolutely needed. The High Court's jurisdiction was not an appropriate forum to investigate the serious facts involved in the case as it was stated that the applicant was allowed to withdraw the constitutional petition and seek necessary relief against the powers of the civil court. ? property advocate from Khanewal lawyer