Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HINOPAK MOTORS LIMITED versus COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION

Sections 1 (3), 2 (8) (F) [as amended by the Provincial Employees \ Social Security (Amendment) Ordinance (XXIII of 1993]], increase the payment of contributions of 20 and 64 if appealed to the High Court. An individual was initially employed with a salary of over Rs 1500 (the applicable time limit was increased by amendment) The employer was not liable to contribute in respect of such employee employer. However, he was responsible for up to 1500 rupees, after which he was included in the social security net, in view of the amendment, whereby the wage limit was reduced to Rs 3000 per month at the respective time. Amlat wage employer after the employer will continue to exceed Rs 1,500 under cover. Paying a maximum contribution of 7% to the maximum wage and no more than the maximum amount was the initial salary at which the employee was appointed who will determine if he or she has a Social Security Net. I am included or not and as a result his salary increase will not take him out of the social security net but it is a ban. \ r \ n \ r \ n best law firm from Shamsabad lawyer