HUSSAIN ABID JAFFARY versus STATE
Appreciating the Section 9 (c) evidence, anti-narcotics force personnel entered a government compound that was in joint possession of several officers / officers of the Department of Excise and Taxation Evidence, which showed that most of the properties in Elmira`s case. Properties were. In these cases, the cases in which the proceedings were either before the competent courts or still pending, all such facts clearly indicated that the accused was neither in the special use of Alamir nor Were in exclusive possession of the goods recovered (which were alleged to be in their possession.) The prosecution, in these circumstances, failed to prove its case against the accused, both appeals were allowed and The trial court upheld the conviction and sentence awarded to the accused, and they were acquitted of the charge. And were released \ r \ n. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from More kunda lawyer
