Find a Lawyer

ABID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Further investigation into Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 376, 337A and 338C rape, Shuja, Istiqlal Jan bail, FIR was not explained by the complainant. In the IR, the accused co-accused in the rape allegations file an affidavit in favor of the accused against whom serious allegations were made in the FIR. Such fact is the only and only inquiry into the accused's circle. Enough to bring the matter to the fore. The conditions were guaranteed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• GHULAM ALI v. State 2013 MLD 891
• Malik TAJ MUHAMMAD v. Malik KALU 2013 YLR 893
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2013 PCrLJ 893
• SAIF ULLAH v. MAIMOONA ALMAS 2013 CLC 897
• ABDUL RASHEED alias Muhammad Rasheed v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2013 YLR 903
• BABAR MASIH v. State 2013 MLD 904
• INAAM-UL-HAQ v. MUHAMMAD ALI SHAHEEN 2013 CLC 904
• ANJUM IFTIKHAR QURESHI v. KAMRAN FAROOQI 2013 YLR 909

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

inheritance advocates near Wah Cantt lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes