ABDUL RASHEED ALIAS MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
Article 17 (a) Section 12 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877) excludes the production of extraordinary testimonies of a contract for the sale of immovable property in effect for the specific performance of the contract to sell the real estate. The plaintiff's claim was that there was no fatalities in the plaintiff's case in the non-sale of the extraordinary witnesses. The sale agreement was confirmed by two individuals who were not represented by the plaintiff agreement, which could be entered into without the sale agreement being reduced in writing, but once the process was executed regularly. The same must be confirmed by two men, or one man and two women, as provided under Article 17 (a) of the Law Evidence, 1984, in the present case, in agreement to sell, in the future. I accept responsibility for the transfer of property if the agreement is certified by two witnesses, its evidence can be used only if the witness, when alive and subject to court action, is capable of giving evidence. , And is presented for the purpose of proving the implementation of the alleged contract. Cannot be used as evidence Unless both such witnesses are presented in the witness box, any unauthorized interference with the lower courts' coordination finding is excluded from review. ?
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
