Find a Lawyer

ANJUM IFTIKHAR QURESHI versus KAMRAN FAROOQI

OV, R15 [Lahore High Court Amendment] and Trial for Recovery Case 1 and 2 The male member of the defendant's family was formerly charged with the plaintiff's service against alternative services scope that he was ever Was also not served and for this reason the plaintiff's plaintiff was dismissed and served by her real brother and under the OV, Rule 15 CPC [Lahore High Court Amendment]. Services were completed by an adult male member of the family and it was not claimed that he had strained relations with his family or that the brother had not notified the defendant that the accused's property was attached and the execution proceeded. The notice was issued during and must remain with him. Information on the former party decree claiming that the news release should have been issued without the alternative services under the OV, Rule 20 CPC would be resorted to when it was proved that the defendant was abstaining from service. Or for any other reason ordinary service was not possible but in the present case the service was executed as per OV, appeal of Rule 15 of the CPC [Lahore High Court Amendment] was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ABID HUSSAIN v. State 2013 MLD 897
• ABDUL RASHEED alias Muhammad Rasheed v. MUHAMMAD YOUSAF 2013 YLR 903
• BABAR MASIH v. State 2013 MLD 904
• INAAM-UL-HAQ v. MUHAMMAD ALI SHAHEEN 2013 CLC 904
• Rai MUHAMMAD ASIF NAWAZ v. State 2013 PCrLJ 910
• Sh. MUHAMMAD IJAZ v. Sh. MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ 2013 YLR 914
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. ISLAM UD DIN 2013 PTD 914
• MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ v. ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (INVESTIGATION) PUNJAB, LAHORE 2013 PCrLJ 920

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best advocate from Bolan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes