OV, RR 10 & 20 and O IX, R 13 Former Order, keeping the service of process aside, the duty of proof of reasonable service has been suspended by the orders of the Temporary Courts, whereby the respondents were given the ex parte decree. The request for separation was approved. Alternative Services Provided Under OV, R 20, CPC Was Not Observed No Response Report Was Refused By The Respondent The server reported that when it arrived So the defendant left but did not report that he had met. The defendant and the defendant refused to accept the service The processor server first required to serve the summons, and if that was not possible then affixed such summons to a significant portion of the person's residential home A summons was issued against him. , And then a postal certificate could be ordered by the publisher, indicating that a copy of the paper was sent to the addressee. No formal observation was made, and the controversial findings of fact were found by the courts below when, on the facts, both the courts below came to the conclusion that the summons was not issued to the respondents, the ex parte decision Had to file an application for separation. And after more than five years, the decree can never be repeated. The petition was dropped.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
