The testimony of the deceased's father and brother in the case was the testimony of the deceased's father and brother, who testified that they had told several suspects to know about the deceased. Contacted repeatedly, but he delayed the case, saying that the witnesses, if they suspect any suspects, should have informed the police about the disappearance, but both said The witnesses remained silent until they were contacted by police code of conduct when witnesses who were closely related to the victim raised suspicion of the fact. It was not safe to rely on his statements and the statements of the two witnesses. One witness said that the deceased came to his shop with two friends and his motorcycle was rented and went away, then said the motorcycle. The evidence presented by him is not reliable because he did not take any action to file a report regarding the disappearance or disappearance of this motorcycle weapon with the police. Was recovered, which was 10 feet away from where the victim's body was recovered. He did not appeal to the general understanding when it was said that when the buggy was found only ten feet away from the recovery site of the dead body, then when his body was recovered, he was not captured. The jurors were recovered 26 days after the recovery of the dead body, which neither the accused owned nor occupied, and said that the place was accessible to everyone and said Is to reside from the place of recovery
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
