NOUROZ KHAN versus HAJI QADOOR
OV, Rr 18 and 19, O IX, R 13 (1), Second Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Ex-decree, putting aside irregularities in the service of summons, disputes of evidence. Supply of Second Provisions A IX, R 13 (1) The CPC scope earlier order was passed by the trial court which led to the High Court ruling that the services were not affected against the defendant. The petition submitted is that the OI, R 13 (1), for the second time, CPC was applied and the order could not be finalized where the court would find that the defendant had a hearing. Knowledge of the history of the world, Order for SX proves, R13 (1) is attracted to CPC but no, if he had no such knowledge then his processor server and statement before the Supreme Court After the report, it was found that in the case of salmon service, the requirement of the lab was not met and is in departure. From the provisions of ON, Rr 18 and 19, CPC was not a proper circuit. There was a question and the court should not be asked to reproduce the evidence and overturn the findings of the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer