Find a Lawyer

SUBEDAR GUL MUHAMMAD versus MIAN MUHAMMAD

Section 8 Settlement Scheme No. VII West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI VI 1959), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Recovery of possession of property on the basis of Settlement Scheme VII The claim for refusal to become the owner of the suit shop and the defendant seeking possession of the land, which was his tenant, denied the relationship to the plaintiff's landlord and the tenant, and on the basis of purchase from the plaintiff in the plaintiff's trial. Claimed to be the owner. In favor of the plaintiff, however, the appellate court accepted the appeal and dismissed the trial court's High Court in exercising the amended jurisdiction and did not restore the trial court's ruling and decree that it had purchased the shop from the person who owned it. Entitled to exchange. Or who purchased the same item from his transfer, therefore, his claim of ownership through the purchase was without foundation and the plaintiff failed to prove that the person from whom he had purchased the shop, since the partition The person had acquired the title of the plaintiff, he was entitled to transfer it under Settlement Scheme VI, and the defendant's claim was without basis on the basis of the refusal of title to the eviction proceedings, the question of the relationship of the landlord and tenant. The lease may be related to the withdrawal of such suit in the civil suit, through an oral claim or in the absence of a landlord and tenant relationship. Based on the decision on the application. The second evidence will not defeat the title of the owner of the right to prove that the defendants' two fact-finding facts on the important issue relating to the ownership of the shops and the nature of the defendant's possession read or prove false news. law websites from Yazman Mandi lawyer