Sections 302 (b), 324 and 337f (iii) of the murder, the general character of the aerial shooting was attributed to the suspect in the testimony of Millat Ahmad, the defendant, and the FIR was also not charged Was. Or before the trial court that the accused hurt any of the casualties, on the basis that the accused was on a much better basis than the six accomplices, whom the trial court evidence related to the recovery of 30 bore pistols. Was acquitted, the accused piece was not dropped. The evidence was not placed before the accused, while recording his statement under Section 2342, the CRPC could not be used to report the criminal science laboratory sentence against him, the trial court Had wrongly relied on the accused to punish him because he had not been exhibited during that time. While recording his statement under section 2342 was neither tried nor convicted, CCP Moto was charged with the accused as well as his co-accused, as he has been a partner He did not believe the same, he could not be trusted to maintain his conviction if the same dispute did not prove a charge. In the opinion of the police, the accused was found guilty or the accused's crime was unacceptable because he was convicted. During the police interrogation, the accused was guilty of a nature offense in the prosecution case and the accused was convicted of murder. And for the murderous attack on those injured by the trial court, he was set aside, giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
