Sections 302 (b), 324, 353, 392, 440 and 34 of Kutul Amad commit a fine, assault or criminal force to prevent a public servant from performing his duties, bandits, misdemeanors, evidence of joint intent. In an attempt to reduce the circumstances, the Trial Court did not register the Chief of Complainant's delay in reporting the matter to the police, and was cross-examined by the complainant at the request of the defense lawyer. This entry was saved and is not recorded. The death complainant could not be subjected to cross-examination; his statement could not be relied upon. Star-eyed witnesses were hollow accounts of the prosecution in which it fully involved the evidence of other eyewitnesses. That was the same online eye witnesses said. There was no enmity with the witnesses making false allegations, the witnesses were examined at length, but their evidence could not be shaken during the course of the investigation. They testified against each other on all material aspects of the case, evidence that says the witnesses were trustworthy, the suspect was regularly named in the FIR, prosecuting the firearm on the deceased. There was no calculation of having an identity parade. At the time of the incident, the nature and extent of the injury and the seizure and occurrence of the type of weapon with the help of medical evidence, the medical evidence was fully complied with, which was filed by Section 2 Section 2 (b), the trial court, pp. C was given to him, retained, but in some mitigating circumstances, his sentence ranged from death to life imprisonment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
