MST. SHAHIDA MOHSIN versus CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB
R22 (A) and Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation Act (X of 2004), Article 3 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Allotment house rules were allotted for Government Employees Housing Foundation, paid by the applicant. Were the default. It was then allotted to another member of the Housing Foundation, who sold the same within a period of three months and another member of the applicant's housing housing foundation was informed that the Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation's R22. According to (A), 2005; the new allottee could not separate the house within one year of the delivery. Legally in relation to this house, the rights of the third party were secured, which was protected by a valid notification issued by the provincial government, which had a one-year condition. Do not apply for the first sale / transfer of the allotted house. No other matter has been dealt with by the second allottee, so the High Court has no valid reason to interfere with the legal effect of the transfer in favor of the respondent High Court. Was not However, it has been observed that although this notification has been in place for three years, it was not included in the typed out / printed version of Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation Rules, 2005 and it has been reported to inform the general members. For the purpose of the Housing Foundation, the principles were shown in the original form but where the Foundation was so inclined, the rules were amended to raise the voice for the convenience of those who were required to comply with Rule 22 (A) of the Punjab Government Servants Housing Foundation Rules 2005. ) Opportunities / syncing. Property
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
