Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 148, 149 and 335 Convention of Conventions (10 of 1984), Article 22 Qutel-e-Azam, Armed Conflicts with Deadly Weapons, Illegal Assembly Further inquiries, which were made after the nomination of the accused in connection with the parade grant, were not accused of firing the accused party to the accused along with the co-accused due to a particular injury, which led to his death. ? The name of one person and the other accused were not listed in the FIR and they were involved in the crime through the complainant's supplemental statement, which was recorded after a delay of two days, I have been told that the prosecution witnesses saw the accused going. Although the complainant and the prosecution witnesses identified the accused in the trial identification parade, their usefulness was terminated in the presence of the complainant's supplementary statement, in which case the identity was paraded after the nomination of the accused. The suspect was not attributed to any specific injury and was attributed solely to the identity value of the motorcycle and the recovery of the weapon. The investigating officer found six suspects, including fellow suspects, who suffered particularly fatal injuries. As an innocent complainant, after the dissatisfaction with the investigation, a private complaint was assigned to the accused. As it was in the FIR Trial Court. Determine which of them was true or reliable against the accused, whether in the FIR, or in the private complaint, or the complainant's additional statement or the investigating officer, such fact alone It was enough to bring the matter to fruition
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
