Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus RANA MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Section 2 (c) (i), 13 and 15 Removal Requests for Landlord and Tenant Relationships, Refusal to Apply Withdrawal Request by Appellant, who claims to be the landlord and landlord in dispute, Defendant, in his written response, denies the existence of the contract of the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties on the rental controller's appeal filed by the appellant, but the appellate authority issued the rental controller's decree. Removed and removed request removed. Evidence of his claim was not in the record, no oral or documentary photo evidence was in support of the appellant's statement of the gift of the appellant registered, the landlord could prove his title in the dispute, but the landlord and the tenant between the parties. Could not prove the relationship of the cedar. Under an agreement, he was in possession of the houses under dispute in his rights, sold the execution b y the appellant in his favor and on the basis of that agreement he had already filed a specific performance suit. The decision was pending before the civil court, and in view of the litigation between the parties, it is evident that the appellant cannot prove the relationship between the landlord and the tenant. The parties and that the appellate authority's decision / order was consistent with the file and evidence of the appellant based on the law, if it was suggested that the defendant could file a lawsuit for possession of the property with the civil court if he or she was in dispute. Gets a title in relation to residence. Registered gift deed, which was not disputed by the respondent, was filed with the appellate authority. when you need a advocate from Jandanwala lawyer