Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHER ALI versus STATE

The clauses 302 (b), 148, 149 and 109 of the witnesses were closely linked to the incident presented by the prosecution and they hated the accused as they were locked in an old murder dispute with the accused party. Witnesses, who lived temporarily five acres away from the incident, said witnesses made significant improvements in front of the trial court during police investigations, recovered a gun from the suspect's possession during the investigation of the case. Legally. There was virtually no crime left in the premises because the gun allegedly recovered from the suspect's possession cannot be linked to the alleged crime, rather than providing medical evidence produced by the prosecution in the case, to the ocular account. , Had gone a long way in making the controversy. Both said witnesses heard the case. According to medical evidence, the accused has to improve his statements before the police to bring his charges against the accused. The eyewitnesses further alleged that the victim's body was dragged to a considerable distance by the accused and his co-accused, but medical evidence presented the prosecutor himself lied to the eyewitnesses in this regard because the dead body No trace was found. For some purpose, a criminal case was a double weapon because it could cut both ways if the alleged motive could show aggression against the accused. At the same time, it was equally possible that the same background of hostility between the parties could immediately be asked to falsely implicate the accused in the case of eyewitnesses and in any case the hollow one presented in the case. immigration advocates email from Ghazi lawyer