Section 497 (2) of the Migration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 bail, no further evidence was taken from the Grant Investigation Agency for further investigation except mere oral statements of the complainant and its witnesses. During the investigation of the case, there was a background of a business dispute between the parties arising from the dissolution of a partnership of the accused and in the same background, the investigation of the accused's false case could not be ruled out, before the trial was investigated. Had already been completed and an incomplete invoice had already been presented to the trial court, no longer requiring the physical custody of the accused for the purpose of investigation, which was alleged by the complainant at a time when The parties were already busy terminating their partnership due to serious differences. Transferring a huge amount of money through the complainant to the accused at such a stage to send the overseas complainant, illegally, proves that there is widespread evidence to be filed by the trial court in this case between the parties. Necessary and at this stage the case was not yet reached, a case was registered against the accused, Section 497, Section (2) of the CCP, it was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
