TANVIR HUSSAIN versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER
Article 10 and 11 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition alleges the abolition of the FIR, the abductor had stated his age at about eighteen years and he allegedly abducted the FIR in the age of Also claimed to be puberty, abortion, elder and in probation. Recorded as eighteen, the alleged kidnapper has clearly maintained that he was charged in connection with the alleged abduction in the FIR and in connection with the commission of adultery but the fact I am wrong that the lady maintained the fact that he had in fact left her. The complainant had his own home and then voluntarily and voluntarily entered into a marriage contract with the accused, a proof that a registered Naka complainant did not show any interest in the matter because he had previously Did not bother entering the hearing. The High Court, nevertheless, required a hearing by the court which created the impression that the complainant was not interested in opposing, alleging adultery in the case or against it, for adultery. The basis was, in these circumstances, the filing of an FIR by the complainant, nothing happened, but the complainant's frustration and frustration by the complainant was an abuse of process to allow such an FIR to be filed. ? These laws were presented as a law that could not be allowed to remain forever.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jampur lawyer