Find a Lawyer

PRESENT: SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN AND M. JAVED BUTTAR, JJMIAN ABDUL QADEER versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 3 House Building Finance Corporation Service Regulations, 1957, Regulation No 15 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 2A and 4 Senior Employees accused of dismissing a job related to seniority were dismissed. He was dissatisfied with the seniority list. , Repeated representation, and eventually the authorities had the power to correct this list, while initiating the process of mismanagement of such representation and removing the civil servant from the employment (special powers) section 3 of the ordinance. Dismissed from employment under, the order approved by the authorities was retained in 2000. The accuracy of the service tribunal simply because the civil servant continued to represent against the seniority list and was reinstated in 1998 did not result in his appointment as a result of gross misconduct, coercion and illegal manipulation. Was. No evidence has been found for the establishment of mismanagement and manipulation under the Utilities and Discipline Rules, never charged against the authorized authority, no charges of fraud, fraud, corruption and fraud. Nor did the revised seniority list issued against the civil servant on 10 2 1990 have been finalized because the civilian representation of the servant against him was rejected by the Appellate Authority on 2 4 1992, which ordered Was not designated or amended by the Executive Authority nor has any competent judicial authority Prior to this, the seniority affair had become a thing of the past and the decision was closed. The service was set aside by the tribunal and the civil servant immigration advocates phone number from Jampur lawyer