Find a Lawyer

STATE versus RAJA ABDUL REHMAN

Appeal against the fate of the accused under the Arts 3/4 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 249 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Section 249A, CRPC Place, where large quantities of drugs were recovered. The suspect was from the accused and was often seen at the recovery site. The co-accused was the accused's employee. Such evidence requires explanation from the accused magistrate, therefore, in strange cases. I should not have decided the plea of the accused. At the same stage under Section 249A, CRPC, when the case reached the final stage, otherwise the second plea of the accused under Section 249A, CRPC was rejected on the ground that the evidence. A correct review can only be concluded. Of the case and that the contents of Section 249A, CCPC were not fulfilled. After the appeal was not filed against him in the High Court, the final order was found to be exempted from the final sentence. As such, work on the third application under Section 249A, CRPC was illegal and outlawed, as well as negative comments, observations and comments from the magistrate regarding the prosecution's testimony and their evidence. But if taken into account overall, it will have an impact. The order of acquittal of the accused under Article 249, A, CRPC of damaging the prosecution case against the co-accused shall not be sanctioned in the same category as in the first category of acquittal of the principles applicable to the second category of acquittal. Not applicable. The High Court did not accept such important and material aspects of the case and decided to appeal very quickly and expeditiously. online advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer