MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN
Article 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Award, keeping aside the issue of mismanagement, the parties on the dispute of realism have preferred their dispute to arbitration, the applicant who entered the case filed by The statements were recorded by the arbitrator and subsequently awarded. The trial court, after considering the objections filed by the parties, dismissed the award roll of the court review and constitutional petition filed by the applicant before the appellate court and the High Court, thereby legalizing the applicant. Failed to deal with corruption. Arbitration before the trial court, therefore, was not interfered with by the High Court. The Supreme Court refused to examine the factual dispute under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
