Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN


Article 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Award, keeping aside the issue of mismanagement, the parties on the dispute of realism have preferred their dispute to arbitration, the applicant who entered the case filed by The statements were recorded by the arbitrator and subsequently awarded. The trial court, after considering the objections filed by the parties, dismissed the award roll of the court review and constitutional petition filed by the applicant before the appellate court and the High Court, thereby legalizing the applicant. Failed to deal with corruption. Arbitration before the trial court, therefore, was not interfered with by the High Court. The Supreme Court refused to examine the factual dispute under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.