ALI KHAN versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the parties are close relatives and this incident has come to light throughout the day, the identity of the accused could not cause any disturbance to the witnesses, complaining. The witnesses were credible and credible at the scene of the incident, all three killed and at the scene of the crime. The witnesses had no motive or animosity for the accused in the triple murder case, alleging that the three victims were killed by some perpetrators. Courts found less than the crime scene on the spot proved that the rifle recovered from the accused was fired. Immediately after the murder of the three killed, the accused killed the fourth victim in his house. There was a son and a resident as well as a natural witness to the incident. The trigger for the incident was also brought on the record. A rifle recovered from the accused was also recovered from the scene of the incident. Reliable, the result of which the courts would have reached was inconceivable and any intervention on the amount of punishment. Was not admitted but the appellate permission was denied to both the accused in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Tank lawyer