SARDAR ALI versus WAZIR KHAN
Article 12 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 72 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Specific Performance of Contract to Sell Contract, Evidence of Factual Inquiries by the Courts Under Plaintiff Is that he bought the property Out of a total sale of Rs 1,25,000, the sale agreement came into operation with a payment of Rs. 1,00,000. The defendant refused to execute a contract and accused it as a forged document. Appearing as a witness, failed to present credible evidence to prove that the transaction took place in connection with the sale of the land between the parties, after which, the plaintiff paid Rs. The trial court dismissed the case for a payment of Rs 1,00,000 out of the total sale and the judgment was upheld by the Court of Appeal and review by the High Court. The sale agreement as justified in the jurisdiction was not proved on the record in accordance with the law, therefore, the Supreme Court refused to grant any exception to the decision, which was based on the correct definition of the evidence available on the record and to appeal. The appeal of was denied \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Parachinar lawyer