Find a Lawyer

MST. KANEEZAN BIBI versus MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Article 42 Ordinance of Muslim Family Laws (VIII of 1961), Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Declaration of Limitations Legal legacy of the plaintiff entitled son of the deceased Muslim Muslim, daughters and heirs of the first Muslim son of the deceased The change in their Shariah section of extent was a certified claimant who was one of the sons of the deceased owner of the suit property who claimed that he had purchased the suit property from his father at the time of his life. Declared the title to the extent of the portion and the trial. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff's decision, and through the trial, the Appellate High Court rejected the decision, and the Appellate Court High Court through the Appellate Court maintained that the defendants had stayed the case. ? The question about boundaries was not drawn at all because in accordance with the variation of inheritance, on 23rd 1979, the plaintiff gave the defendant an indefinite part and so he never had to worry about anything. The plaintiffs were never even aware that otherwise, the plaintiffs had become partners in the property until their grandparents died when their grandfather died and therefore could not obtain it. Aggravating for any reason unless the right was denied which was obtained by such knowledge in the early 1980's, the present case of the defendants filed on 22 11 1980, at the right time, the defendants had 12 4 The property was sold in 1980, and at the same time, in this case, the Supreme Court found that nothing was unusual until the life of the grandfather, and after that, everything was passed on to the oldest sons only Was planned to deprive the daughters of list of supreme court advocates from Sarai Alamgir lawyer