Find a Lawyer

M.A. HAMEED FAIZI versus THE STATE

Section 426 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Articles 9 (vi) and 10 Interim Guarantees, the Investigation Officer's Grant stated in his evidence that nothing was available on record against the accused and presented to the Registrar Cooperative Societies. According to the report, Punjab was not found to be reasonable against them through NICFC and they were not involved in the work of NICFC. No allegation was made against the accused that the honorary directors. In his capacity, he did not provide any money to the National Industrial Cooperative Finance Corporation Limited. As a debt or that he had recovered any financial loss in the case of any or any Society (NICFC) trial for personal gain for himself and anyone else, McKinsey said at the trial It was observed that the accused did not pay interest. Although he was not accused of receiving a loan, the advertisement was merely convicted on the basis that he was also harmed in maintaining the regretful conservatism raised by the accused, the first fic. Should have been tolerated, in the circumstances the accused was finally allowed on interim bail law firms from Daharki lawyer