Find a Lawyer

WALI MUHAMMAD versus ELLAHI BAKHSH THROUGH L.RS. AND OTHERS

Section 11 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 0 I, R 10 Recovery of Occupation Maintenance Commissioner's Allotment Order, Keeping the Controversial Party Separated, Allotted After Controversial Persons Not Implementing Property Impact The property discussed was allotted to the plaintiff on 13 8 1958 Settlement authorities canceled this allotment on 21 9 1963, on the basis that the suit land was located in the urban area while in the rural area. The claimant's claim was affirmed in this regard. The proceedings before the Chief Settlement Commissioner, the plaintiffs were allotted the suit land on 31 8 1969 and the cancellation order was finalized by the Chief Settlement Commissioner in Constitutional Jurisdiction in the High Court on 25 5 1974, 6 3 1985. Allotment was restored. The plaintiff, who filed a civil suit for recovery of possession on the basis of the High Court order, dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff d after the appellate court High Court upheld the jurisdiction and restitution. The judgment was upheld and the orders passed by the courts rendered by the plaintiff were that underground land was not available for allotment to the defendants and they were unauthorized. Defendants' opinion was that the High Court's order in the constitutional jurisdiction was granted in their absence because they were not a party to the proceedings, the plaintiff's plaintiff filed a constitutional petition challenging the order of the Chief Settlement Commissioner. Through which their allotment was canceled and they did not receive any relief. The defendants were appealed against, so they were enforced as a party to the constitutional petition. top civil advocates from Lawrence pur lawyer