Find a Lawyer

DOST MUHAMMAD ALIAS SOWALI versus STATE

Evidence on the testimonial record of the testimonies of Sections 4 324 and 3re3 did not indicate that the accused was aware of the police party, before the incident, the prosecutor's witness stated that it was in the dark when the incident occurred. Witnesses' testimony sought clarification on the identity of the suspect, a situation that could not be traced on the record. The two witnesses did not mention in their statements that the suspect was with two other people, while a witness in Marsala said there were two other men with guns who were also armed and opened fire. According to a witness in the police party, the raiding party included the police as well as Lewis, but no Lewis officer was testified in the case where the accused and two of his accomplices were allegedly shooting indiscriminately. At the police party, when the identity of the accused was very suspicious and the statements of the witnesses were not consistent with each other, which was not received by any independent source, the accused also had no basis for the trial court's finding. Cannot be made, in the circumstances, cannot be agreed with the prosecution. The accused, the trial court's decision was set aside and the accused acquitted and released jobs for advocates from Lakki Marwat lawyer