Find a Lawyer

SADO KHAN KAKAR versus STATE

Section 4/5 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 561A, 190 (3), 193 (1) and 204 Orders to abolish the Sessions Court Order under which the accused was taken into custody and sent to jail. After appearing before him for the issuance of a non-bailable warrant arrest, he was tried for deportation, accusing the accused of positively cultivating poppy crops in positive terms. , Under which he linked it with the commission. The C-Report report of the crime was not based on confidential information, the inquiry of the trial court investigation officer was not bound to be investigated or agreed, or as a result of the investigation under which the accused in the FIR was found innocent, The original person who had the cultivation of the poppy crop was admitted by the magistrate on the report submitted in the form of incomplete challan under section 190 (3), CCPC, and the sessions court has therefore Was released. The legal justification for continuing the stringent action against the accused named in the EFIR, after admitting the offense under section 193 (1), in connection with the case sent by the CCP to the magistrate, The accused had to be magistrate in column 2 of the case. The challan was an unnecessary decision by the trial court to submit a subpoena after it was found innocent in the investigation, therefore, does not rule out the effect of admitting this offense, including the issuance of proceedings against the named accused. It was permissible to issue arrest warrants in the sense of section 204, CCP Observation recorded in the trial at the trial that record of the offense against the accused famous high court advocate from Jamrud Road lawyer