GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE
The testimony of Section 13E & 9 evidence was believed to be central to the case of self-defense and the sudden incursion of the tomb and murder, and it is believed that the victim came to the accused's house and attacked her. The accused intervened, the abductor and the one who held the Quran down fell down. The suspect then collected Kalashnikov and opened fire on the casualties and injured two others. Kalashnikov's preparations were with the investigating officer immediately after the incident, in which circumstances, did not fall under the purview of Section 13 (e) or his section 9 was affected. Arms ordinance suspect was acquitted accordingly \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Makli lawyer
