STATE versus RAHIM DAD
Sections 302 (A) and 365 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (E) and 7 (A) [as amended by the Anti-Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance (Examinics of 2001]] provide evidence of the allegations. Worse than the accusation, it was charged under Section 302, on the basis of a compromise between the PPC and the legal heirs of the prosecution witnesses, there was no enmity with the accused in the case of the kidnapping and prosecution. Other witnesses identified the suspect in the identification parade. In addition, their actual presence in court and kidnapping of a minor girl was established at the scene of the incident, except for an accused who received only ransom money and acted as mediator between the original culprits. They were supported by the pistol and confession of the confessional statement of the accused, as well as the ballistic expert's conviction report under Section 6565 AA, PPC. He was sentenced to death, but the death sentence was sentenced to life imprisonment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Bat Khela lawyer
