STATE versus JAMADAR MUHAMMAD KHAN
The definition of Section 302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) and 21L of evidence hid the shop owner, the prosecution witness, in fear because of the incident. Was. The Table Anti-Terrorism Court acknowledged the facts and circumstances of the case and charged them under Section 7 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, which led to their acquittal by the accused The trial was not prejudiced. The special court, which considered the meeting of the court in view of section 32 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, was neither arbitrary nor perverse trial court, arguing the evidence supported the medical evidence as well as the circumstances of the ocular evidence. There was also a conspiracy of the accused to replace Kalashnikov's armed guards with actual intent and his firing on the convict with a joint intention proved his record in the case of his death on the spot, absent. The conviction of the accused in the case was retained, however, at the trial Mills. Was accused of this, the trial court was sentenced to life imprisonment. Each of them was sentenced to life imprisonment on the principle of consistency in the interest of justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Bunner lawyer