Section 2 30b (b) / Q 34 Definition of evidence, the benefit of the doubt is the absence of direct evidence in this case, the evidence of the prosecution is linked to the facts related to the circumstances, the prosecution's witness, who was the deceased's uncle, And there was a relationship between the accused. Not pleasant Prosecution's testimony as an opportunity witness, it was not safe to rely on their evidence, the statement of the prosecution's other witness was on the same lines as the other two witnesses of the prosecution were unnatural and material contradictions and improvements were made to them. The statements were found in. Saw and submitted by Wajitkar that the two accused were not able to rely on the witnesses' testimony, the accused confessed jointly to the role of the accused during the incident, the way the incident took place. The resulting weapon, or because of it, was not mentioned to have committed the murder, said the extra-judicial confession was a weak type of evidence of extra-judicial evidence and the prosecution's witnesses presented extra-judicial confession, a reliable motive. Was not because the prosecution did not prove that the blood was stained - from Churri than Recalculate after the break was deposited in the Office of Chemical Examiner. One month from the incident; in these circumstances, it was unlikely that the blood would not have been wasted on the theft during this period; it was alleged that the theft from the accused was not reliable, in which case the accused was arrested He was arrested 15 days after the incident. He did not appeal to the mind of a cautious person who has been accused of maintaining a blood-stained weapon for so long, because during this period he has
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
