MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus SARDAR AHMAD
Section 302/34 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Constitutional Laws (Enforcement) Act (IX of 1974) was adopted by the trial court, under which a number of the accused were recording statements under Article 342, CR PC Were not exposed or provided for. There was no opportunity to refute this by presenting the defense evidence as per the provisions of section 26 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Islamic Contempt Laws (Enforcement) Act 1974, the witnesses were not cleared, in the circumstances of the ugly decision to sentence the accused. Was isolated. And the case was referred to the trial court for the latest verdict after it was resolved in accordance with the aforementioned errors.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Fateh Jang lawyer
