Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus AJ&K GOVERNMENT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, MUZAFFARABAD

Sections 4, 11, 18 and 54 Award to the Collector for Land Acquisition with Referee Court - Appellant Land Owners Received Compensation Amount Given by Collector Land Under Protest and Request for Acquired Land Owners The matter was referred to the referee court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after hearing by the parties, without deciding the matter of merit, subject to the applicable sanctions under section 18 of the referee court's Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Therefore, the request for reference was denied. Determination of objections in relation to the measurement of land; amount of compensation; and reference to distribution of compensation by the court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The question related to could not be determined, to the extent and about the options. Regarding the limitation of section 18 of the Act, the referee court and the collector provided that it was the collector who had to determine the limitation question even if a time restriction request was sent to the court. Cannot raise boundary object from The Collector who has the jurisdiction to decide whether the application was barred under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, or if the Collector has the opinion that such application is beyond the prescribed time. If so, the decision and the decree were decided by the referee court. The appeals were set aside and the case was referred to the referee court for judgment. immigration advocates email from Jamshoro lawyer